Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Mitigating the legal risks of licencing in open-source software and database elements

7 minutes Jun 17 2025

Read More
featured image

The UPC turns two!

2 minutes Jun 16 2025

Read More
Curiosity line green background

SG Trade Marks Fast Programme: Accelerated Examination for Local Applications in Singapore

Jun 12 2025

Read More