Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Reshaping the Game: An EU-Focused Legal Guide to Generative and Agentic AI in Gaming

Aug 14 2025

Read More
Curiosity line blue background

Hong Kong’s Clinics to Prepare for Licensing Regime

Aug 13 2025

Read More
Curiosity line teal background

Legality of upcycled products: A Singapore perspective

6 minutes Aug 04 2025

Read More