ASIC v Macleod: Lessons for privilege in Voluntary Disclosures to Regulators

Written By

jonathon ellis Module
Jonathon Ellis

Partner
Australia

I am an experienced litigation and investigations lawyer based in Sydney, leading Bird & Bird's Australian disputes and investigations practice and co-leading our global Defence and Security practice.

jonathan tay Module
Jonathan Tay

Senior Associate
Australia

I am a senior associate in the Dispute Resolution team in Sydney. I provide succinct, solutions orientated advice to help our clients solve complex problems, mitigate future risks and develop strategies to simplify their decision-making process.

evelyn park Module
Evelyn Park

Associate
Australia

I am an associate in our Dispute Resolution Group in Sydney

Authors: Jonathon Ellis, Jonathan Tay, Evelyn Park, Jonathan Wong

Introduction

A pivotal appeal judgment delivered in December 2024 (lifted from non-publication orders in February 2025) clarified that the production of documents to Australian Securities Investment Commission (ASIC) pursuant to a voluntary disclosure agreement (VDA) did not amount to a waiver of legal professional privilege (LPP).

In the case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macleod [2024] FCAFC 174 (Appeal Judgment), the Full Federal Court found in favour of ASIC and Noumi Limited (formerly Freedom Foods Groups Ltd) (Noumi) that the primary judge did not err in the application of the dominant purpose test but did err in his conclusion that LPP in the documents had been waived.

This article delves into the positive implications of the Appeal Judgment, which removes uncertainty for businesses the subject of any regulatory investigations who may be concerned about the exposure of risks arising from producing documents pursuant to a VDA for cooperation with regulators and its implications on protecting privileged information.

Background

The Appeal Judgement overturns part of an earlier interlocutory decision following orders for the production of documents in Australian Securities and…

Full article available on Disputes +

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line pink background

Cleared for Penalties: Webjet’s Misleading Consumer Practices Don’t Fly with the Federal Court

Aug 15 2025

Read More
shopping trolley

Talking Shop July 2025

Aug 05 2025

Read More
Curiosity line blue background

Legality of upcycled products: A Singapore perspective

6 minutes Aug 04 2025

Read More