The recently introduced Approved Code of Practice (“ACOP”) clarifies what is expected of companies’ Chief Executives (“CEO”) and Board of Directors (“BOD”) in relation to ensuring employees’ workplace safety and health. By way of background, the ACOP provides guidance for companies to attain the outcome stated in a regulation. Under Section 48(1) of the Workplace Safety and Health Act 2006 (“WSH Act”), an officer of the company (including the CEO/BOD) can be held accountable for the WSH Act offence committed by his/her company, unless he/she proves that: (a) the offence was committed without the officer’s consent or connivance; (b) the officer had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of the offence. From a mitigation viewpoint, compliance with the ACOP will give the company and/or its CEO/directors a basis to argue (a) and (b) in the context of regulatory prosecution under the WSH Act.
HR and Legal teams should note the following aspects of the upcoming ACOP:
Ensuring compliance with the ACOP is no longer a purely operational issue; we foresee that HR teams will have a greater role to play going forward in the following regard:
The lawyers in our employment practice are experienced in handling workplace safety and health issues from a litigation and regulatory perspective. We can work with you to design and tailor the appropriate HR policies, procedures and platforms to support your organisation in meeting the requirements of the Code of Practice: Chief Executives’ and Board of Directors’ Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Duties.
This article is produced by our Singapore office, Bird & Bird ATMD LLP. It does not constitute as legal advice and is intended to provide general information only. Information in this article is accurate as of 30 September 2022.