“This is serious, Mum”: Serious harm considered in Rader v Haines

Written By

julie cheeseman Module
Julie Cheeseman

Partner
Australia

I am a partner in our Sydney office, where I specialise in media and technology disputes and advice.

A recent decision of the District Court of New South Wales is one of the first cases where an Australian Court has considered the interpretation and application of a ‘serious harm’ element. Although the UK Defamation Act applied to the publication in question, the Court’s discussion of the English caselaw will likely have relevance to interpretation and application of the ‘serious harm’ element introduced by the MDAPs.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Dutch Court Backs The Hague’s Fossil Fuels Ad Ban

5 minutes Jun 18 2025

Read More
Curiosity line yellow background

Burying the Lead (Generation)? ACCC Commences Review of Unsolicited Selling

Jun 18 2025

Read More
Robot Arm

Our experts discuss Tech Disputes with Financier Worldwide Magazine

Jun 18 2025

Read More