“This is serious, Mum”: Serious harm considered in Rader v Haines

Written By

julie cheeseman Module
Julie Cheeseman

Partner
Australia

I am a partner in our Sydney office, where I specialise in media and technology disputes and advice.

A recent decision of the District Court of New South Wales is one of the first cases where an Australian Court has considered the interpretation and application of a ‘serious harm’ element. Although the UK Defamation Act applied to the publication in question, the Court’s discussion of the English caselaw will likely have relevance to interpretation and application of the ‘serious harm’ element introduced by the MDAPs.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Employment Litigation in Singapore: Employees Can Double-Strike with Employment Claims Tribunal Win Followed by High Court Claim

4 minutes Jul 11 2025

Read More
featured image

Singapore Issues Advisory to Stop Use of NRIC Numbers for Authentication

3 minutes Jul 11 2025

Read More
Keyboard and tablet on yellow background

(R)evolution in interfaces used to conclude distance contracts

Jul 11 2025

Read More