Limiting liability in Consumer Terms: High Court rules in favour of online customer in £1.7 million dispute with Betfred

Written By

andy danson module
Andy Danson

Partner
UK

I'm the head of the firm's international Media, Entertainment and Sports group, a cross-disciplinary international team focused on supporting our clients in the sports, gambling, broadcasting, social media and digital content, games, music, publishing, advertising and marketing sectors.

elizabeth dunn module
Elizabeth Dunn

Partner
UK

As a partner in Bird & Bird's Commercial team and a member of our Media, Entertainment & Sport Group based in London, my practice focuses on regulatory and commercial matters in gambling and sport.

In Green v Petfre (Gibraltar) Ltd (t/a Betfred), the High Court ruled that Betfred were liable to pay out a customer’s £1.7 million winnings on a side bet allegedly caused by a software defect, despite Betfred’s claims that their consumer terms excluded liability for such defects.

This judgment provides an important reminder for any B2C businesses, not just gambling operators, seeking to exclude their liability for software defects online (or indeed for anything else). In particular, online businesses should be asking themselves whether their exclusions of liability are sufficiently (1) specific; (2) prominent; and (3) fair. If they fall short in any of those three areas, they may not be enforceable.

Read the full article here >

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line green background

UK government progresses towards a regulated heat market

5 minutes Aug 20 2025

Read More
Curiosity line pink background

Cleared for Penalties: Webjet’s Misleading Consumer Practices Don’t Fly with the Federal Court

Aug 15 2025

Read More
featured image

Reshaping the Game: An EU-Focused Legal Guide to Generative and Agentic AI in Gaming

Aug 14 2025

Read More