Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA January 2020
Written By
In this month's report, we look at the relevance of disclaimers when assessing likelihood of confusion in Patent- och registreringsverket v Mats Hansson (Case C-705/17). We also look at criminal sanctions for the unauthorised use of a registered trade mark under Section 92(1) of the Trade Marks Act in R v James Clements ([2019] EWCA Crim 2253)
Latest insights
More Insights
A game-enhancer, not a game-changer: key takeaways on the new UAE Media Law penalties
5 minutes Jun 10 2025
What the UK-US ‘trade deal’ means for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic
7 minutes Jun 03 2025
Ambush Marketing beyond the Olympics: when advertising becomes unfair competition
Jun 03 2025