Lessons learned from the BIG MAC: how to prevent trademark revocation for non-use

Written By

francesca rombola Module
Francesca Rombola

Associate
Italy

Here at Bird & Bird, I am a senior associate in our Intellectual Property Group in Milan with experience across the food and beverage, luxury, fashion and design sectors.

paola ruggiero Module
Paola Ruggiero

Counsel
Italy

As Counsel here at Bird & Bird, I have broad experience in Italian and European IP law, representing our clients from industries including food, fashion, entertainment, media, retail, finance and insurance, in trade mark, copyright and design matters.

The EUIPO Cancellation Division (the “Division”) ruled against the owner’s BIG MAC trademark registration, stating it should be revoked for non-use. This outcome was surprising given the BIG MAC burger is one of the most popular and well-known products in the fast-food market. On 14 December 2022,the EUIPO board of appeal(the “Board”) departed from the ruling granting revocation on the basis of non-use by partially upholding the appeal filed by the owner.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Report of Trade Mark Cases For the CIPA Journal May 2025

1 minute Jul 04 2025

Read More
Curiosity line yellow background

Restructuring - Australian Retail & Hospitality Series: Part 2 - Creative Restructuring Approaches: What’s Working in Retail & Hospitality Administrations

Jul 03 2025

Read More
featured image

EPO Upholds, UPC Revokes: A Tale of Diverging Views on PCSK9 Antibody Patent

2 minutes Jul 02 2025

Read More