Lessons learned from the BIG MAC: how to prevent trademark revocation for non-use
Written By
Associate
Italy
Here at Bird & Bird, I am a senior associate in our Intellectual Property Group in Milan with experience across the food and beverage, luxury, fashion and design sectors.
Counsel
Italy
As Counsel here at Bird & Bird, I have broad experience in Italian and European IP law, representing our clients from industries including food, fashion, entertainment, media, retail, finance and insurance, in trade mark, copyright and design matters.
The EUIPO Cancellation Division (the “Division”) ruled against the owner’s BIG MAC trademark registration, stating it should be revoked for non-use. This outcome was surprising given the BIG MAC burger is one of the most popular and well-known products in the fast-food market. On 14 December 2022,the EUIPO board of appeal(the “Board”) departed from the ruling granting revocation on the basis of non-use by partially upholding the appeal filed by the owner.
Latest insights
More Insights
Expansion of the definition of product under The Revised Product Liability Directive – the Finnish Perspective
4 minutes Jun 10 2025
A game-enhancer, not a game-changer: key takeaways on the new UAE Media Law penalties
5 minutes Jun 10 2025
The Defectiveness of Products under the New EU Product Liability Directive - the German Perspective
5 minutes Jun 05 2025