Case Update: Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc: choice of forum clauses and public policy grounds – Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc [2021] FCAFC 122

Written By

emma croft Module
Emma Croft

Senior Associate
Australia

I am a senior associate in our Dispute Resolution Group in Sydney, specialising in media and technology disputes, commercial litigation and privacy and cybersecurity advisory work.

On 9 July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia overturned a decision to award a stay based on an exclusive jurisdiction/choice of forum clause on the basis that public policy considerations require that most claims brought under Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Law Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) should be determined in Australia.

The practical implication of this decision is that while companies should be aware of any exclusive jurisdiction or choice of forum clauses in agreements they enter into, they should also be aware that there may be some limited instances, including where a claim is brought under Part IV of the CCA, where there are “strong reasons” to allow the suit to proceed in Australia instead.

Read the full article here >

Latest insights

More Insights
Car on Target

New US tariffs in the automotive industry: how to protect contracts and respond to rising costs?

May 12 2025

Read More
glass building

Fintech Features May Edition

May 09 2025

Read More
featured image

Time to check-out… the European Accessibility Act and its impact on travel, hospitality and leisure

5 minutes May 08 2025

Read More