Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)

Written By

shaun lee module
Shaun Lee

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial and regulatory disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.

BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

The Commission’s Quick Fix? Freezing Additional ESRS Requirements for CSRD First-Wave Undertakings

6 minutes Jun 19 2025

Read More
Curiosity line yellow background

From sales to sanctions: Optus faces $100 million penalty for unconscionable sales practices

Jun 19 2025

Read More
featured image

Dutch Court Backs The Hague’s Fossil Fuels Ad Ban

5 minutes Jun 18 2025

Read More