Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)
Written By
Partner
Singapore
As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial, regulatory & shareholder/labour disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.
BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.
Latest insights
More Insights
Quincecare Duty in the Age of Automated Screening - Navigating Uncharted Territory in Hong Kong
9 minutes Aug 21 2025
Cleared for Penalties: Webjet’s Misleading Consumer Practices Don’t Fly with the Federal Court
Aug 15 2025
A decision of epic proportions: Federal Court finds that app store providers contravened Australia’s competition laws
Aug 14 2025