Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)

Written By

shaun lee module
Shaun Lee

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial, regulatory & shareholder/labour disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.

BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

When Foreign Laws Collide with Local Claims: How Hong Kong Courts Now Handle Restitutionary Claims Tainted by Foreign Illegality

7 minutes Jul 31 2025

Read More
Curiosity line pink background

June 2025: Australian Sports Law Update

Jul 29 2025

Read More
Curiosity line teal background

Data, Privacy and Cyber Overview (Australia) – (January to June 2025)

Jul 29 2025

Read More