Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)
Written By
Partner
Singapore
As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial, regulatory & shareholder/labour disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.
BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.
Latest insights
More Insights
UK Government Unveils Small Business Plan to Support SMEs by Tackling Late Payments
5 minutes Sep 11 2025
When Illegality Challenges Defences: How Hong Kong Courts Balance the Competing Claims of Victims and Downstream Recipients
10 minutes Sep 09 2025
EU Revised Product Liability Directive 2024: Navigating the New Liability Framework for Non-EU Manufacturers
6 minutes Sep 04 2025