Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)

Written By

shaun lee module
Shaun Lee

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial and regulatory disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.

mark ng module
Mark Ng

Senior Associate
Singapore

I am a senior associate in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, and have represented clients in various high-value, cross-border, commercial litigation and international arbitrations.

BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Solar canopies on UK car parks: an innovative step along the road to net zero?

4 minutes May 30 2025

Read More
featured image

Turbulent Seas: Navigating Delays & Uncertainty in Dutch Offshore Wind

3 minutes May 30 2025

Read More
featured image

France's Ministry of Justice Initiates Task Force to Reform French Arbitration Law

9 minutes May 29 2025

Read More