Singapore Court: failure to call witness no reason to set aside arbitration award

Written By

shaun lee module
Shaun Lee

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial, regulatory & shareholder/labour disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.

BVU v BVX [2019] SGHC 69 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court's decision in BVU v BVX that an arbitration award would not be set aside on the basis of public policy or fraud simply because the successful party had failed to call certain witnesses or to disclose certain internal documents. The court also refused to countenance the use of subpoenas by the unsuccessful party to obtain documents as a means to relitigate the merits of the dispute.

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line teal background

Quincecare Duty in the Age of Automated Screening - Navigating Uncharted Territory in Hong Kong

9 minutes Aug 21 2025

Read More
Curiosity line yellow background

Cleared for Penalties: Webjet’s Misleading Consumer Practices Don’t Fly with the Federal Court

Aug 15 2025

Read More
Curiosity line green background

A decision of epic proportions: Federal Court finds that app store providers contravened Australia’s competition laws

Aug 14 2025

Read More