A Light Touch Regulatory Framework for AI

Written By

roger bickerstaff module
Roger Bickerstaff

Partner
UK

With over 25 years' experience as a leading technology lawyer and now based in both our London and San Francisco offices, I have extensive experience advising on tech infrastructure and outsourcing projects.

A more controlling framework is needed for Tech that impacts on fundamental rights, such as predictive policing and the use of AI in criminal justice, potentially dangerous environments (e.g. autonomous vehicles) and the health sector. Tech developments that do not relate to fundamental rights (even though important to individuals), such as shopping apps and some aspects of social media, do not need to be subject to regulatory controls.

We recommend that a ‘light-touch’ but graduated regulatory framework for innovative Tech with components of self-regulation should be developed. This regulatory framework should take account of, reinforce and build in the focus on corporate responsibility that many companies are now developing. It should provide a regulatory environment that is applicable to and responds to the Tech environment, using – wherever possible – review and transparency mechanisms, instead of heavy-handed, inappropriate and difficult to exercise legal remedies.

Under this approach a balance should be achieved between enabling innovative AI solutions to be developed and implemented whilst giving sufficient regulatory protection for problems to be tackled.

View the full article on digitalbusiness.law >

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line blue background

From sales to sanctions: Optus faces $100 million penalty for unconscionable sales practices

Jun 19 2025

Read More
Robot Arm

Our experts discuss Tech Disputes with Financier Worldwide Magazine

Jun 18 2025

Read More
featured image

Mitigating the legal risks of licencing in open-source software and database elements

7 minutes Jun 17 2025

Read More