Singapore Court: setting aside a portion of an arbitral award (BAZ v BBA)

Written By

shaun lee module
Shaun Lee

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Dispute Resolution Group in Singapore, I act regularly for our private sector and governmental clients in high-value complex transnational commercial, regulatory & shareholder/labour disputes across the TMT and financial sectors, as well as in the infrastructure, energy & utilities space.

BAZ v BBA and others and other matters [2018] SGHC 275 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court’s decision in BAZ v BBA and the implications of having a portion of an international arbitration award set aside as being contrary to a country’s public policy on the rest of the award and on the parties to the award.

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line blue background

Digital Duty of Care: What Phase 2 eSafety Codes Demand from Providers

Sep 16 2025

Read More
featured image

UK Government Unveils Small Business Plan to Support SMEs by Tackling Late Payments

5 minutes Sep 11 2025

Read More
Curiosity line teal background

When Illegality Challenges Defences: How Hong Kong Courts Balance the Competing Claims of Victims and Downstream Recipients

10 minutes Sep 09 2025

Read More