Singapore Court: failure to call witness no reason to set aside arbitration award

BVU v BVX [2019] SGHC 69 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court's decision in BVU v BVX that an arbitration award would not be set aside on the basis of public policy or fraud simply because the successful party had failed to call certain witnesses or to disclose certain internal documents. The court also refused to countenance the use of subpoenas by the unsuccessful party to obtain documents as a means to relitigate the merits of the dispute.

Latest insights

More Insights
Curiosity line green background

A Clearly Drafted Discretionary Bonus Clause Upholds Employer’s Right to Withhold Bonuses

Sep 20 2024

Read More

EU – DAC6 - ECJ further clarifies the mandatory disclosure obligation

Sep 20 2024

Read More
Folder

Investing in data centres: understanding Permanent Establishment issues

Sep 19 2024

Read More