By Shaun Lee, Jonathan Choo, Selina Toh
06-2019
BVU v BVX [2019] SGHC 69 This arbitration analysis examines the Singapore High Court's decision in BVU v BVX that an arbitration award would not be set aside on the basis of public policy or fraud simply because the successful party had failed to call certain witnesses or to disclose certain internal documents. The court also refused to countenance the use of subpoenas by the unsuccessful party to obtain documents as a means to relitigate the merits of the dispute.
Click here to read more >
You can search by keyword, sector or practice area and then optionally filter by a location
Keywords Sector Defence & Security Automotive Aviation & Aerospace Aircraft Finance Airlines Commercial Aerospace Airports Travel Unmanned Aircraft Systems Energy & Utilities Renewables Energy Management Energy Network and Transmission Energy Digitalisation Rail Energy Storage Nuclear Oil & Gas Mining and Minerals Financial Services Retail and Consumer Consumer law Food & Beverage Food & Beverage Regulatory Hotels & Leisure Luxury, Fashion and Retail Food & Beverage Regulatory Digest Wellness Life Sciences and Healthcare Life Sciences Healthcare Technology & Communications Communications Devices and Components Cloud, Software & Services Online & Digital Data Centres Postal Satellite and Space activities Media, Entertainment and Sport Broadcasting Publishing Tessellate Gambling Games Marketing Music Social Sport Practice Area Banking & Finance Commercial Competition & EU Law Compliance & Investigations Corporate Capital Markets Mergers & Acquisitions Private Equity Venture Capital Dispute Resolution Commercial Disputes International Arbitration Franchising International Education Infrastructure Intellectual Property Brands Copyright & related rights Patents Product design Trade Secrets Transactional IP International HR Services Employment Employee Incentives and Benefits Business Immigration Outsourcing Privacy and Data Protection Data breach and Security Incidents E-Privacy Directive GDPR EU-US Privacy Shield Data Protection Officer Services GDPR Representative Services Product compliance and liability Regulatory & Public Affairs Public Projects and Procurement Procurement Challenges Real Estate Construction and engineering Regulatory and Administrative Restructuring and Insolvency Tax Corporate Tax Indirect Tax, Trade and Customs Transfer Pricing Tax Disputes Tech Transactions Trade and Customs Customs EU Trade Defence Export Controls, Sanctions and Embargoes Trade Regulatory In Focus 5G Australia's Notifiable Data Breach Scheme Autonomous Driving Blockchain Brexit Glossary of terms used in relation to Brexit Cloud Computing Cybersecurity Digital Services Tax Esports European Electronic Communications Code FinTech General Data Protection Regulation Geo-Blocking Guide to IP rights in the UK In focus Implementation Tracker AVMS Directive In Your Corner Influencer Marketing International Expansion Life Sciences Medical Devices Mobile Health Navigating Hong Kong's Competition Law OTT Oxygy Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA Journal Shareholders Directive II Tracker The EU Trade Mark Reform - The biggest change to trade mark law for 20 years The Internet of Things Trade Secrets The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court Unmanned Aerial Systems
Location Africa Asia-Pacific Australia Belgium Central and Eastern Europe China Czech Republic Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary India Israel Italy Japan Latin America Luxembourg Middle East Netherlands Nordic Region North America Poland Russia and the CIS Singapore Slovak Republic Southeast Europe and Turkey Spain Sweden Switzerland and Austria UK United Arab Emirates United States Western Europe Go
Looking for news over 5 years old?
Our UK disputes team is delighted to send you the latest edition of our Dispute Resolution Update featuring a selec… https://t.co/PSbWyiDdNK
Will we see the first prosecutions for failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion in 2020? Nicola O'Connor… https://t.co/SXRbvEy9fR