In late September 2024, the State Council of China published the Administrative Regulation on Network Data Security (“Regulation”), effective January 1, 2025. This Regulation establishes a comprehensive framework for regulating cross-border data transfers and platform data protection, introducing a robust set of compliance requirements.
This is the third article in our series, focusing on the Regulation’s key provisions related to cross-border data transfer and platform data protection, along with our analysis of its implications.
If you would like to subscribe for our newsletters and be notified of our events on China cybersecurity and data protection, please contact James Gong at [email protected].
China’s regulatory landscape for cross-border data transfers has undergone significant evolution in recent years. The Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”), alongside the Cybersecurity Law (“CSL”) and the Data Security Law (“DSL”), forms the backbone of the data export regime. The PIPL outlines three primary routes for Personal Information Processors (“PI Processors”) to export Personal Information (“PI”), while the CSL and DSL mandate security assessments for exporting important data (refer to the first article in this series for the definition of important data). These routes, collectively referred to as the “Data Export Regime,” are:
1. Governmental Security Assessment (“Governmental Assessment”):
Required for:
2. PI Protection Certification (“Certification”): Issued by CAC-accredited institutions, though this mechanism remains non-operational in practice.
3. Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”): PI exporters must enter SCCs with overseas PI importers and submit signed SCCs along with a Personal Information Protection Impact Assessment (PIPIA) to the provincial CAC, as outlined in the 2023 Measures on the Standard Contract for the Export of Personal Information.
However, practical implementation of the Data Export Regime has revealed gaps and challenges. In response, the CAC issued the Regulation for Promoting and Administering Cross-Border Data Flows (“New Data Export Regulation”, see our comments on this regulation here) in March 2024, which replaced previous Thresholds and introduced exemptions allowing PI to be transferred across borders without adhering to the Data Export Regime under specific circumstances:
Additionally, the PIPL imposes specific obligations on large online platform service providers—defined as PI processors operating significant platforms with large user bases and complex business models. These obligations include:
However, the lack of clear criteria for identifying large online platforms and implementing these obligations has created practical ambiguities, which the Regulation seeks to address.
Chapter V of the Regulation consolidates and refines rules on cross-border transfers of PI and important data, aligning with the New Data Export Regulation while introducing additional exemptions. Key provisions include:
1. Cross-Border Transfer of PI
The Regulation maintains the three routes for PI export under the PIPL and introduces six exemptions for transfers exempt from the Data Export Regime.
(a) Three Routes:
The Regulation does not explicitly redefine Thresholds, indicating that those in the New Data Export Regulation remain applicable.
(b) Six Exemptions:
The Regulation allows PI to be freely transferred across borders in the following scenarios:
2. Cross-Border Transfer of Important Data
The Regulation reinforces CSL and DSL requirements, mandating a Governmental Assessment for exporting important data. Exported data must align with the purposes, methods, scope, types, and scale specified during the assessment. Non-personal data is not considered important unless designated by authorities, easing compliance for non-personal data exporters.
Chapter VI of the Regulation outlines data protection obligations for all online platform service providers, with additional requirements for large platforms. It also provides clarity on identifying large platforms, though some ambiguities persist.
1. Obligations of All Online Platform Service Providers
(a) Supervision Obligations:
(b) Automated Decision-Making:
(c) Recommended Practices:
2. Obligations of Large Online Platform Service Providers
(a) Identification of Large Platforms:
The Regulation defines large platforms as those meeting three criteria:
(b) Social Responsibility Reports:
(c) Transparency, Fairness, and Impartiality:
The Regulation represents a pivotal advancement in China’s data governance framework, refining cross-border data transfer rules and platform obligations while addressing some ambiguities. However, unresolved questions, such as criteria for business complexity and social impact, necessitate ongoing monitoring of regulatory guidance.
For Enterprises with Cross-Border Data Needs:
For Online Platforms:
By proactively adapting to the Regulation, businesses can navigate China’s evolving data security landscape effectively.