Rescission for misrepresentation: a lower hurdle for claimants in cases of fraud

Written By

sophie eyre module
Sophie Eyre

Partner
UK

I am a partner and co-head of our International Dispute Resolution Group, as well as the London team. I specialise in complex disputes, often of a cross border nature, and have particular expertise in the aviation & defence sector, commercial life science, and in matters involving fraud.

Those seeking to unravel a contract on the basis of a pre-contractual fraudulent statement will not have to show that the statement in question was the reason they entered into the contract in order to succeed in their claim. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that it will be enough for a claimant to show that the false statement "materially influenced" their decision to enter into a contract, or that it was "actively present to his mind" to prove that they were induced by the statement[1].

The test for inducement where there is no fraud – i.e. where false statements and assurances were given negligently but not deliberately or recklessly – is stricter. To succeed in claiming damages or rescinding a contract in such cases, a claimant will still need to show that it would not have entered into the contract with the defendant but for the relevant statements.

View full article>

Latest insights

More Insights
Robot Arm

Our experts discuss Tech Disputes with Financier Worldwide Magazine

Jun 18 2025

Read More
featured image

In-Depth: Contractual performance and debarment under the Procurement Act 2023: implications for suppliers

11 minutes Jun 17 2025

Read More
featured image

Expansion of the definition of product under The Revised Product Liability Directive – the Finnish Perspective

4 minutes Jun 10 2025

Read More