Copyright protection for factual compilations in Singapore: creativity alone is not enough

Written By

pin ping oh module
Pin-Ping Oh

Partner
Singapore

As a partner in our Intellectual Property Group in Singapore and part of the Media, Entertainment & Sports team, I focus on contentious IP matters including IP infringement litigation, patent revocation actions and trade mark oppositions, but also advise clients extensively on non-contentious matters including IP commercialisation, patent and trade mark freedom-to-operate issues and brand protection.

The Singapore Court of Appeal has recently confirmed, in the case of Global Yellow Pages Limited v Promedia Directories Pte Ltd [1], that for a factual compilation such as a directory or a list to be protected by copyright there must be creativity in the selection and arrangement of the data. However, an oft-neglected consideration is that creativity alone is not enough, and it is equally important to show that the compilation was created by a human author working alone or in collaboration with others in order to establish authorship of the compilation. As the cases have demonstrated, this may be a difficult task in the case of computer-generated works or when there is reliance on user generated content.

View the full article >

This article is produced by our Singapore office, Bird & Bird ATMD LLP, and does not constitute legal advice. It is intended to provide general information only. Please contact our lawyers if you have any specific queries.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Patent Litigation in Practice Series: Spotlight on Australia - Preliminary discovery in patent disputes

4 minutes May 29 2025

Read More
featured image

First UPC decision on Second Medical Use

2 minutes May 28 2025

Read More
featured image

Report of Trade Mark Cases For the CIPA Journal April 2025

1 minute May 20 2025

Read More