When AI goes wrong – part 2: autonomous vehicles

Written By

will bryson module
Will Bryson

Partner
UK

As a Partner in the Tech Transactions team, I primarily advise clients on technology contracts across the Technology and Defence sectors. I focus on emerging and cutting edge technology (Artificial Intelligence in particular), more 'traditional' defence contracting, and the intersection of the two - helping clients navigate the rapidly evolving Defence Tech sector.

In this second of two articles considering liability for the mistakes of AI systems, we look at driverless cars and who might be responsible when things go wrong.

Driverless cars promise a great deal – these machines with reflexes far sharper than any human’s will make the roads safer. At the same time, they will be able to travel closer together at higher speeds, reducing congestion and journey times. In fact, driverless cars may change the norm when it comes to vehicle ownership – car owners would be able to send their vehicles out as autonomous taxis while they work or sleep, which reduces the need to own a car in the first place.

View the full article on digitalbusiness.law >

Latest insights

More Insights
Car on Target

Employee discounts and car sharing for electric vehicles – Green Mobility for employers (part 2)

Jul 18 2025

Read More
Curiosity line green background

UK government announces £63 million EV investment package

3 minutes Jul 16 2025

Read More
featured image

Germany: Market Opportunities for Automotive Suppliers in the Defence Industry

2 minutes Jul 15 2025

Read More