94 results were returned
The last year has been an exciting year for FRAND. The TCL v Ericsson verdict was set aside. The FTC's decision against Qualcomm was also lifted pending appeal. Germany's Supreme Court has overturned the Sisvel v Haier ...
The High Court has construed a patent using US legal rules and held that, since the licensed product did not infringe the patent, no royalties were payable.
The Court of Appeal has considered the effect of the decision not to cross-examine the patent owner's expert witness on his opinion on obviousness.
The Court of Appeal has held that two patents for the production of human antibodies using transgenic mice were not invalid for insufficiency.
The Patents Court has held that a Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) for a combination product was invalid, following a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the meaning of Article 3 of the ...
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that a product composed of several active ingredients with a combined effect may be protected by a basic patent in force under the Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) ...
Katharine Stephens looks at four cases decided in the last few years and draws out of them five "rules" which exclusive licensees must follow if they want to retain the rights to sue infringers.
This article explains how the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Unwired Planet has created a new multi-jurisdictional dispute resolution forum and considers what refinements future cases in this area might make.
The High Court has held that a patent was invalid as anticipated by a prior disclosure by the patent owner and obvious over an item of cited prior art.
DEFAULT DEFAULT Most Relevant Alphabetical Chronological Go
REFINE RESULTS: