By Richard Dissman
The on-going legal battle between Apple and Samsung about, among other things, the design of their respective tablet computer products has demonstrated that a legal dispute relating to design law can be truly multi-jurisdictional in nature.
This article was first published in the July/August 2013 issue of the ITMA Review, the journal of the Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (ITMA). For more information on ITMA, please visit http://www.itma.org.uk/
Partner Germany
You can search by keyword, sector or practice area and then optionally filter by a location
Keywords Sector Aerospace, Defence & Security Unmanned Aircraft Systems Automotive Aviation Aircraft Finance Energy & Utilities Renewables Energy Management Energy Network and Transmission Energy Digitalisation Energy Storage Nuclear Oil & Gas Mining and Minerals Financial Services Retail and Consumer Consumer law Food & Beverage Food & Beverage Regulatory Hotels & Leisure Luxury, Fashion and Retail Food & Beverage Regulatory Digest Wellness Life Sciences and Healthcare Life Sciences Healthcare Technology & Communications Communications Devices and Components Digital Technology Solutions, Internet Services and eCommerce Software and Services Data Centres Postal Satellite and Space activities Media, Entertainment and Sport Broadcasting Publishing Gambling Games Marketing Music Social Sport Practice Area Banking & Finance Commercial Competition & EU Law Corporate Capital Markets Mergers & Acquisitions Private Equity Venture Capital Dispute Resolution Commercial Disputes International Arbitration Franchising International Education Infrastructure Intellectual Property Brands Copyright & related rights Patents Product design Transactional IP International HR Services Employment Employee Incentives and Benefits Business Immigration Outsourcing Privacy and Data Protection Data breach and Security Incidents E-Privacy Directive GDPR EU-US Privacy Shield Product compliance and liability Regulatory & Public Affairs Public Projects and Procurement Real Estate Construction and engineering Regulatory and Administrative Restructuring and Insolvency Tax Business Tax Advisory Services and Transfer Pricing Indirect Tax Personal Tax Tax Disputes Tech Transactions Trade and Customs Customs EU Trade Defence Export Controls, Sanctions and Embargoes Trade Regulatory In Focus The Internet of Things 5G Australia's Notifiable Data Breach Scheme Autonomous Driving Blockchain Brexit EU Legislation Tracker Glossary of terms used in relation to Brexit Cloud Computing Compliance & Investigations Cybersecurity Esports FinTech General Data Protection Regulation Geo-Blocking Guide to IP rights in the UK In focus International Expansion Life Sciences Medical Devices Mobile Health Navigating Hong Kong's Competition Law OTT Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA Journal The EU Trade Mark Reform - The biggest change to trade mark law for 20 years Trade Secrets The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court Unmanned Aerial Systems
Location Africa Asia-Pacific Australia Belgium Central and Eastern Europe China Czech Republic & Slovakia Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary India Israel Italy Japan Latin America Luxembourg Middle East Netherlands Nordic Region North America Poland Russia and the CIS Singapore Southeast Europe and Turkey Spain Sweden Switzerland and Austria UK United Arab Emirates United States Western Europe Go
Looking for news over 5 years old?
RT @twobirdsIP: Our Trade Mark Directive Tracker: All major changes to national trade mark law in one map https://t.co/72CQDDRsA4 https://t…
Partner Jonathan Taylor speaks to @thetimes today about the Caster Semenya case, ahead of Court of Arbitration of S… https://t.co/MmmtBtuvoy