BIRD & BIRD
IT & E-commerce Law Bulletin October 2009
Intro_Banner.jpg
Print friendly version  

Once again, we focus on a diverse range of online disputes and recent legislative developments. Of particular interest are recent German decisions on the copyright responsibilities of file-sharing hosts, the precise scope of rights in online music and the legality of reselling used software. Elsewhere, we explore recent decisions from the French courts (on database rights and the law of confidence), the UK courts (Google's successful defence against liability for defamatory search results and the finding that a trade association was not liable for incorrect statements on its website) and the first Swedish case on court orders for disclosure of user identities by online intermediaries, following local implementation of the IPR Enforcement Directive. We also explore a controversial amendment to the UK Government's ongoing P2P file-sharing consultation and recent Swedish Government focus on E-Commerce and tax. Finally, we look at the emergence of e-prescriptions in the Czech Republic and the publication in The Netherlands of standard ICT terms and conditions.
 


National IT and E-commerce Law

 
Czech.jpg   Czech Republic
 

In this Issue

Czech Republic

France

Germany

The Netherlands

Sweden

UK 


Feedback
 

We welcome comments on the content of the Bulletin.

E-prescribing in the Czech Republic: 1450 pharmacies, but no doctors, register for central prescriptions database

Andrea Jarolmkov and Vojtěch Chloupek, Prague
news.jpg

Electronic prescribing of medicines, also known as "e-prescribing", is a key part of the eHealth concept currently being adopted in the Czech Republic. Although the relevant legal regulation concerning e-prescribing was put in place at the end of 2007, due to data protection issues and current lack of take-up by doctors the project is unlikely to be finished until 2010.

 

Top


France.jpg  France


French Supreme Court decision in website scraping case confirms narrow scope of database rights

Sandrine Rambaud, Paris

CaseReport.jpg
The French Supreme Court has dismissed a claim that an aggregation service that extracted real estate advertisements from websites infringed database right.  This illustrates the narrow scope of database rights after the 2004 decision of the European Court of Justice in BHB v William Hill.

 

Paris Court of Appeal holds that Dailymotion is a host and did not have knowledge of infringing material

Anne-Sophie Lampe, Paris

CaseReport.jpg
The Paris Court of Appeal has held, overruling a previous First Instance Court decision, that the Dailymotion video sharing website was not liable for copyright infringement since it had not received adequate notification that content posted to its website by users was unlawful.

 

Top


Germany.jpg  Germany


German Court decides split of music online copyrights is invalid

Fabian Niemann, Frankfurt

CaseReport.jpg
The Regional Court of Munich  has decided that the music industry's common practice of splitting online rights into the mechanical reproduction right and the right to make publicly available and to subsequently claim licence fees for both rights separately, conflicts with German copyright law. The court held that, in order to fulfil the legislative purpose of avoiding multiple claims and ensuring legal certainty of licences, such splitting of one uniform economical-technical process into two separate exploitation rights is not possible.

 

Hamburg Court rules on copyright liability of RapidShare

Fabian Niemann, Frankfurt

CaseReport.jpg
In its judgment of 12 June 2009 the Regional Court of Hamburg granted an injunction (cease and desist order) in preliminary proceedings in favour of the German music collecting society GEMA against the Swiss filehoster RapidShare AG.  The decision was based on the finding that although RapidShare used an MD5 hash filtering program, it had not done sufficient to prevent its users from illegally uploading music to its servers and thereby making the music publicly available.  Contrary to many press reports, the court did not impose a fine or damages on RapidShare.

 

Software publishers can prevent resale of bare licences and back-up copies of used software

Jrg-Alexander Paul, Frankfurt

CaseReport.jpg
Three German Courts of Appeal have held that the distribution of used software is only permitted if the copyright holder consents or if the software is distributed in the same physical form (i.e. on the media) on which it was initially put on the market. 
 

Top


Netherlands.jpg  The Netherlands


New standard terms and conditions for the Dutch ICT industry

Huub de Jong and Frank Simons, The Hague

news.jpg

In January 2009 ICT~Office, the Dutch trade association of ICT-companies, published an updated set of standard conditions which modernise the widely known FENIT-conditions.

 

Top


Sweden.jpg  Sweden

 

First Swedish information orders case overturned on appeal

Henrik Nilsson, Stockholm

CaseReport.jpg
Following the Swedish implementation in April of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive, the Solna District Court issued Sweden's first order requiring an ISP to disclose the identity of the user behind an IP address alleged to have been used for activities infringing copyright. However, this decision has now been overturned by the Svea Court of Appeals.


Sweden implements the IP Rights Enforcement Directive for Copyright

Henrik Nilsson, Stockholm

news.jpg

A new Swedish regulation concerning copyright enforcement came into force on 1 April 2009. The regulation was introduced in order to complete the implementation of the EU Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive.


The Swedish tax consequences of e-commerce

Hampus kerstedt and Henrik Nilsson, Stockholm

feature.jpg

In this feature we survey the tax consequences of e-commerce and the virtual economy in Sweden.

 

Swedish tax authorities cash in on the virtual economy

Hampus kerstedt and Henrik Nilsson, Stockholm

news.jpg

The Swedish tax authority "Skatteverket" is coming to the end of a three-year tax investigation project into the E-Commerce Sector. The E-Commerce project is proclaimed as a great success so far. Skatteverket has to date issued formal decisions finding an additional SEK 670 million (€63.4 million/£55 million) in undeclared income as a result of its cyberspace tax audits.

 

Top


UK.jpg  UK

 

Google not liable for defamatory comments in search snippets

Graham Smith and Brooke Whitaker, London

CaseReport.jpg
Google has been found not liable for defamatory comments in its automatically generated search results.  The English High Court held that Google was merely a facilitator, and had not published the search result snippets.


First UK decision on negligence liability for incorrect information on website
Chris Stone, London

CaseReport.jpg

The English Court of Appeal has held, by a 2-1 majority, that a trade association was not liable to a user of its website who suffered financial loss through relying on incorrect information on the website.  The majority would have found the trade association liable, had the website not invited the user to request a further information pack from which the error on the website would have been apparent.  This was held to amount to an opportunity for the user to make an independent inquiry, and that a user could not be expected to rely on the information on the website alone without making such an inquiry. Accordingly, it was held by the majority that the trade association did not owe a duty of care to the claimants.

 

P2P file sharing legislation – latest UK developments

Taliah Davis, London

news.jpg

The UK Government consultation on proposed peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing legislation, issued following the Digital Britain report, has been controversially amended to include the possibility of suspending internet access for repeat infringement.
 

Top



The content of this update is of general interest and is not intended to apply to specific circumstances. The content should not, therefore, be regarded as constituting legal advice and should not be relied on as such. In relation to any particular problem which they may have, readers are advised to seek specific advice. Further, the law may have changed since first publication and the reader is cautioned accordingly.





BIRD & BIRD

Bird & Bird is an international legal practice comprising Bird & Bird LLP and its affiliated and associated businesses. Bird & Bird LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC340318 and is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Its registered office and principal place of business is at 15 Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1JP.

For details of Bird & Bird, our offices, our members, the use of e-mail and regulatory information, please see www.twobirds.com and, in particular, www.twobirds.com/english/Legal_Notices.cfm.

The word "partner" is used to refer to a member of Bird & Bird LLP or an employee or consultant, or to a partner, member, director, employee or consultant in any of its affiliated businesses, who has equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of members of Bird & Bird LLP and of any non-members who are designated as partners, and of their respective professional qualifications, is open to inspection at our London office address.

All such persons are solicitors, registered foreign lawyers or non-registered European lawyers.